<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Global Warming Skeptics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</link>
	<description>Exposing the Anthropogenic Climate Change Fraud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:57:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is The Sun Causing Global Warming? by sunsettommy</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3437&#038;cpage=1#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>sunsettommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3437#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The very large energy outflows from several strong El-Nino&#039;s since 1982.Have helped cool down the oceans over all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes that is correct.There is a small cooling trend in the oceans since 2002.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consider why these large recent El-Nino&#039;s are actually accelerating the drive to a big cool down in world temperatures,in the near future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Global Warming trend since the 1850&#039;s is just about played out.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very large energy outflows from several strong El-Nino&#8217;s since 1982.Have helped cool down the oceans over all.</p>
<p>Yes that is correct.There is a small cooling trend in the oceans since 2002.</p>
<p>Consider why these large recent El-Nino&#8217;s are actually accelerating the drive to a big cool down in world temperatures,in the near future.</p>
<p>Global Warming trend since the 1850&#8217;s is just about played out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suzuki&#8217;s sockeye black eye by sunsettommy</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3439&#038;cpage=1#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>sunsettommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3439#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How can that be?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sarcasm begins.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the oceans turning into acid and hot,hot water building up in the deep oceans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Surely our hero James Hansen and David Suzuki can explain the contradiction.They are our environmentalist experts to explain it all in detail, how those dumb fish can thrive despite the years of being smashed by the horrors of global warming effects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe I can get rich convincing millions of sick people to just swim off the coast of Washington and Oregon state coastlines.Where they will suddenly improve their health.For cost of only $99.95 per hour.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sarcasm ends.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can that be?</p>
<p>Sarcasm begins.</p>
<p>With the oceans turning into acid and hot,hot water building up in the deep oceans.</p>
<p>Surely our hero James Hansen and David Suzuki can explain the contradiction.They are our environmentalist experts to explain it all in detail, how those dumb fish can thrive despite the years of being smashed by the horrors of global warming effects.</p>
<p>Maybe I can get rich convincing millions of sick people to just swim off the coast of Washington and Oregon state coastlines.Where they will suddenly improve their health.For cost of only $99.95 per hour.</p>
<p>Sarcasm ends.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is The Sun Causing Global Warming? by Dan Pangburn</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3437&#038;cpage=1#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Pangburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3437#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>Global warming has stopped. Objective application of science and engineering reveals the cause of temperature trends since 1895 including the temperature run-up in the last half of the 20th century and the flat temperatures since.
Â 
Research, with latest findings regarding projected temperature trends is reported at &lt;a href=&quot;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true&lt;/a&gt;. The 6/27/10 pdf presents a rational equation that accurately calculates the average global temperatures since 1895 with a coefficient of determination of 0.88. That means that it explains 88% of the measured temperatures for 114 years and counting. The best that GCMs have done is significantly less than this. The equation predicts that the future trend of average global temperatures will be down. The above link and sub links, including links to the temperature data reported by the five reporting agencies, track the data back to the published credible sources. The work can be verified by anyone competent with a spreadsheet.
Â 
From 2001 through June 2010 the atmospheric CO2 increased by 20% of the total increase from 1800 to 2001 while the average global temperature has not increased significantly and the trend of yearly averages from 2001 through 2009 is down. The El Nino that made early 2010 appear to be a bit warmer than the down trend, peaked in March, 2010 and average global temperature is now declining. 
Â 
This El NiÃ±o warmed the air enough for NOAA to announce the warmest ever period. They failed to say that â��everâ�� includes only the last 130 years or so which includes part of the recovery from the Little Ice Age. They also failed to mention that the new record was only 0.02C higher than the previous record. A more correct announcement would have been that the temperature has not changed significantly for over a decade. Saying that the average global temperatures are the hottest on record is about as profound as saying that you drove 10,000 miles last year and the last 10 days were among the greatest distance traveled since the beginning of the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global warming has stopped. Objective application of science and engineering reveals the cause of temperature trends since 1895 including the temperature run-up in the last half of the 20th century and the flat temperatures since.<br />
Â <br />
Research, with latest findings regarding projected temperature trends is reported at <a href="http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true"  rel="nofollow">http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true</a>. The 6/27/10 pdf presents a rational equation that accurately calculates the average global temperatures since 1895 with a coefficient of determination of 0.88. That means that it explains 88% of the measured temperatures for 114 years and counting. The best that GCMs have done is significantly less than this. The equation predicts that the future trend of average global temperatures will be down. The above link and sub links, including links to the temperature data reported by the five reporting agencies, track the data back to the published credible sources. The work can be verified by anyone competent with a spreadsheet.<br />
Â <br />
From 2001 through June 2010 the atmospheric CO2 increased by 20% of the total increase from 1800 to 2001 while the average global temperature has not increased significantly and the trend of yearly averages from 2001 through 2009 is down. The El Nino that made early 2010 appear to be a bit warmer than the down trend, peaked in March, 2010 and average global temperature is now declining.<br />
Â <br />
This El NiÃ±o warmed the air enough for NOAA to announce the warmest ever period. They failed to say that â��everâ�� includes only the last 130 years or so which includes part of the recovery from the Little Ice Age. They also failed to mention that the new record was only 0.02C higher than the previous record. A more correct announcement would have been that the temperature has not changed significantly for over a decade. Saying that the average global temperatures are the hottest on record is about as profound as saying that you drove 10,000 miles last year and the last 10 days were among the greatest distance traveled since the beginning of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top Climate Scientists Speak out on the Satellitegate Scandal by Peggy Gross</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3370&#038;cpage=1#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy Gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3370#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>It alarms me to see evidence that the powers that be are ignoring or censoring any information that doesn&#039;t have the same viewpoint as they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It alarms me to see evidence that the powers that be are ignoring or censoring any information that doesn&#8217;t have the same viewpoint as they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blacklisted Scientist Challenges Global Warming Orthodoxy by sunsettommy</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3365&#038;cpage=1#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>sunsettommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3365#comment-999</guid>
		<description>By  now it should be apparent that the AGW  hypothesis is not a success.
With all the CO2 increase we have measured over the years.The temperature should have increased a LOT more than it has.Instead we have a feeble rise of around .70 C in 120 years.
Surely by now people should be wondering,why has the much moaned about rapid warming failed to materialize?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By  now it should be apparent that the AGW  hypothesis is not a success.<br />
With all the CO2 increase we have measured over the years.The temperature should have increased a LOT more than it has.Instead we have a feeble rise of around .70 C in 120 years.<br />
Surely by now people should be wondering,why has the much moaned about rapid warming failed to materialize?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blacklisted Scientist Challenges Global Warming Orthodoxy by Dan Pangburn</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3365&#038;cpage=1#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Pangburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3365#comment-997</guid>
		<description>Some of us can do our own research.

From 2001 through June 2010 the atmospheric CO2 increased by 20% of the total increase from 1800 to 2001 while the average global temperature has not increased significantly and the trend of yearly averages from 2001 through 2009 is down. The El Nino that made early 2010 look a bit warmer than the down trend, peaked in March, 2010 and average global temperature is now declining. 
Â 
Research, with latest findings regarding projected temperature trends is reported at &lt;a href=&quot;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true&lt;/a&gt;. It presents a rational equation that accurately calculates the average global temperatures since 1895 with a coefficient of determination of 0.88. That means that it explains 88% of the measured temperatures for 114 years and counting. The best that GCMs have done is significantly less than this. The equation predicts that the trend of average global temperatures will be down. The above link and sub links, including links to the temperature data reported by the five reporting agencies, track the data back to the published credible sources. 
Â 
As the atmospheric CO2 continues to increase and the average global temperature does not, perhaps the comments of ill-informed people will subside.
Â </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of us can do our own research.</p>
<p>From 2001 through June 2010 the atmospheric CO2 increased by 20% of the total increase from 1800 to 2001 while the average global temperature has not increased significantly and the trend of yearly averages from 2001 through 2009 is down. The El Nino that made early 2010 look a bit warmer than the down trend, peaked in March, 2010 and average global temperature is now declining.<br />
Â <br />
Research, with latest findings regarding projected temperature trends is reported at <a href="http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true"  rel="nofollow">http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true</a>. It presents a rational equation that accurately calculates the average global temperatures since 1895 with a coefficient of determination of 0.88. That means that it explains 88% of the measured temperatures for 114 years and counting. The best that GCMs have done is significantly less than this. The equation predicts that the trend of average global temperatures will be down. The above link and sub links, including links to the temperature data reported by the five reporting agencies, track the data back to the published credible sources.<br />
Â <br />
As the atmospheric CO2 continues to increase and the average global temperature does not, perhaps the comments of ill-informed people will subside.<br />
Â </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BREAKING: New paper makes a hockey sticky wicket of Mann et al 98/99/08 by sunsettommy</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3362&#038;cpage=1#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>sunsettommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 06:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3362#comment-996</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bwahahahahahahaha!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How many more times do we have to shoot down this &quot;hockey Stick&quot; turkey?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After numerous debunking by various credible researchers over the last 6 years.The paper still get support by the AGW believing cabal.Such as Joe Romm,Tamino,Gavin Schmidt and others.Who obstinately and stupidly think it is a robust paper.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is a flypaper and excellent evidence that that such H.S. supporters are not rational beings and maybe beholden to other interests besides science research.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Readers why get caught in the wrong crowd believing this Hockey Stick crap?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bwahahahahahahaha!!!</p>
<p>How many more times do we have to shoot down this &#8220;hockey Stick&#8221; turkey?</p>
<p>After numerous debunking by various credible researchers over the last 6 years.The paper still get support by the AGW believing cabal.Such as Joe Romm,Tamino,Gavin Schmidt and others.Who obstinately and stupidly think it is a robust paper.</p>
<p>It is a flypaper and excellent evidence that that such H.S. supporters are not rational beings and maybe beholden to other interests besides science research.</p>
<p>Readers why get caught in the wrong crowd believing this Hockey Stick crap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spam comments by sunsettommy</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3339&#038;cpage=1#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>sunsettommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?p=3339#comment-992</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Right after I posted this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I go to my forum and found THREE more worthless membership registration to delete.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Make that NINE so far today.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right after I posted this.</p>
<p>I go to my forum and found THREE more worthless membership registration to delete.</p>
<p>Make that NINE so far today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FORUM by sunsettommy</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?page_id=3043&#038;cpage=1#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>sunsettommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?page_id=3043#comment-989</guid>
		<description>I notice that not only are you a confirmed delusionist.You are also too chicken to try convincing us in my forum.

We are entering a long term cooling trend due to several climatic cycles being in operation.

The AMO is trending downward.The PDO is now in cooling trend AND the Sun is unusually low in radiative output.

The recent big warm spell was all of he he he... 6 months long and now ended.And that was almost all due to the Modoki El Nino effect.It is now gone and the remaining warming effect is slowly being dealt with.

The big cooling trend should show up by October.

When are you AGW believers ever going to work up the courage to join the forum and try convincing us of your beliefs.That we are approaching &quot;doomsday&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice that not only are you a confirmed delusionist.You are also too chicken to try convincing us in my forum.</p>
<p>We are entering a long term cooling trend due to several climatic cycles being in operation.</p>
<p>The AMO is trending downward.The PDO is now in cooling trend AND the Sun is unusually low in radiative output.</p>
<p>The recent big warm spell was all of he he he&#8230; 6 months long and now ended.And that was almost all due to the Modoki El Nino effect.It is now gone and the remaining warming effect is slowly being dealt with.</p>
<p>The big cooling trend should show up by October.</p>
<p>When are you AGW believers ever going to work up the courage to join the forum and try convincing us of your beliefs.That we are approaching &#8220;doomsday&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FORUM by frankride</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?page_id=3043&#038;cpage=1#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>frankride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/?page_id=3043#comment-987</guid>
		<description>Global warming will accelerate until it melts every glacier and swamps every coastal city by 2050. That is, if hurricanes, tornadoes and very angry polar bears haven’t killed us by then.Fact is, the only thing accelerating thing about global warming is the number of scientists who are finding the courage to speak out against it.

(snip)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global warming will accelerate until it melts every glacier and swamps every coastal city by 2050. That is, if hurricanes, tornadoes and very angry polar bears haven’t killed us by then.Fact is, the only thing accelerating thing about global warming is the number of scientists who are finding the courage to speak out against it.</p>
<p>(snip)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
