FATAL ERRORS IN IPCC’S GLOBAL CLIMATE MODELS
Rocket Scientist’s Journal
March 31, 2009
by Jeffrey A. Glassman, PhD
EXCERPT:
Some critics of the science of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) urge that its reliance on a consensus of scientists is false, while others simply point out that regardless, science is never decided by consensus. Some critics rely on fresh analyses of radiosonde and satellite data to conclude that water vapor feedback is negative, contrary to its representation in Global Climate Models (GCMs). Some argue that the AGW model must be false because the climate has cooled over the last decade while atmospheric CO2 continued its rise. Researchers discovered an error in the reduction of data, the widely publicized Hockey Stick Effect, that led to a false conclusion that the Little Ice Age was not global. Some argue that polar ice is not disappearing, that polar bears are thriving, and that sea level is not rising any significant amount.
Popularity: 59% [?]












This is a good example of a presentation attacking the source of the errors.
The IPCC reports are an example of cherrypicking (Meta Analysis) of science papers and the unverified climate models they chose.To present a sorrowful future…. unless governmets are allowed to save us from ourselves.
All this fuss over a trace gas that remains a trace gas.A gas that does very little spectrally.
Vincent Gray has posted a comment and that Dr. Glassman has replied.
Worth reading.
Leave your response!
Meta
Send your thoughts
Governor | Senator | Congress
Categories
Doomsday Countdown
Archives
Recent Comments
Popular Posts
Links
Books
Ads