Wash. Post’s Own Meteorologist Counters Paper’s Claims! ‘I wince when hearing…science is ’settled’ — Climate ‘hysteria’ may be ‘another bubble waiting to burst’
Climate Depot
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Marc Morano
EXCERPT:
WaPo’s Andrew Freedman Ducks TV Debate with Climate Depot’s Morano – Demands Separate Taping
[Climate Depot’s Editor’s Note: The Washington Post’s Andrew Freedman has his hands full. After declaring on September 1, 2009, that “increasing climate change skepticism among the public is troubling” because “it flies in the face of most of the scientific evidence,” Freedman now faces a fellow Washington Post “Capital Weather Gang” member — Meteorologist Matt Rogers – who is openly rebelling from Freedman’s stated climate views. Just days after Freedman’s public feud with Climate Depot over climate science, the Washington Post’s Rogers declared his strong climate skepticism on the paper’s “Capital Weather Gang” site on September 10, 2009, titled “A Skeptical Take on Global Warming.”
Freedman had attacked Climate Depot as being “anti-science and anti-science journalism.” But after two lengthy rebuttals from Climate Depot, Freedman threw in the towel and refused to defend his climate views any further. Freedman appears so afraid of defending his global warming assertions, that he refused a TV news program’s offer to a one-on-one debate with Climate Depot’s executive editor (me, Marc Morano).
Popularity: unranked [?]
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Leave your response!