Met Office’s debate over longer-term forecasts
Weatheraction.com
http://twitter.com/Piers_Corbyn
Delta House, 175-177 Borough High Street. London SE1 1HR Tel +44(0)20 7939 9946
From Piers Corbyn +44(0)7958713320 or office above, piers@WeatherAction.com
EXCERPT:
17th Jan 2010
Roger,
You write in the article
Met Office’s debate over longer-term forecasts
By Roger Harrabin
Environment analyst, BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8462890.stm
….And many other meteorologists mistrust Mr Corbyn himself because he refuses to publish his
scientific methods. I have been asking him for several months to offer independent
corroboration of his forecasting successes but none has been supplied. …..
I find that what you write is a LIE.
I have referred you to plenty of independent corroboration* of our forecast accuracy and
successes – sources and documents available via the public link:
http://www.weatheraction.com/pages/pv.asp?p=wact5&fsize=0
The link refers to published independent peer-reviewed verification of the significant skill
of our gale (eg) forecasts, weather bets where we consistently won money and have as a
consequence had that arrangement terminated by the bookmakers, and independent
assessment by a loss-adjusters of our extreme events forecasts showing high skill
around the world.
Popularity: unranked [?]












Leave your response!