<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Global Warming Skeptics</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</link>
<description>Never look at the world through a straw and think you have all the answers</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>webmaster@globalwarmingskeptics.info</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-10T17:35:16-04:00</dc:date>

<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2008-05-10T17:35:16-04:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>
<title>Let everyone, especially students, hear the whole story about climate science</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=957</link>
<description><![CDATA[Canada Free Press
Let everyone, especially students, hear the whole story about climate science
EXCERPT:
By Tom Harris&#160;&#160;Friday, May 9, 2008 


Shooting the messenger of alternative climate science views not constructive &#8211; students can only decide who to believe if they are permitted to hear all rational arguments 
Mike De Souza&#8217;s piece, &#8220;Climate-change skeptics target kids&#8221;, published in various versions in mainstream newspapers across Canada, is a classi]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">957@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>IntheNews</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-10T00:42:04-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Debating points</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=956</link>
<description><![CDATA[NUMBER WATCH
May&#160; 2008
Debating points
John Brignell
EXCERPT:
As we were saying only last month, the motto du jour is get your rationalisation in first. The latest wheeze among the doomsayers is that hell fire is being postponed. Of course, it would have been more impressive if it had been published before the recent decade of measurements showing no warming at all. As it stands, it is nothing more than a testament to the infinite tunability of computer models. The warmers are getting ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">956@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-09T21:44:40-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Has Big Media Global Warming Bias Begun to Endanger the Public?</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=955</link>
<description><![CDATA[The many poor folks&#160;of Galveston Texas in year 1900 died.Because they were told not to be so worried about a storm coming in on them.
Result: 33% of the people died and the THEN second largest city went into a tailspin.
American Thinker
May 09, 2008 
Has Big Media Global Warming Bias Begun to Endanger the Public?
EXCERPT:
Bill Tate
When Maine officials tried to warn residents of the dangers of this winter's near-record snowpack, Big Media slanted the story, hampering efforts to warn ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">955@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-09T21:36:49-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Humanitarian concerns </title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=954</link>
<description><![CDATA[CO2 Skeptic
Humanitarian concerns 
Friday May 09, 2008 9:45 AM BST 



EXCERPT:



Dear All, 

Attached the latest Memo by South African Professor Will Alexander. 

A most thorough analysis of the bureaucratic paralysis and one-way-street policy decisions. 

Please spread wide and far 

Dear All 

Memo 14/08 Humanitarian concerns 

A very serious situation has developed. Climate change science has been demonstrated to be based on false premises. This raises a number of issu]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">954@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-09T21:25:27-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Iconoclast, or not? </title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=953</link>
<description><![CDATA[Interesting comment&#160;by Dr Smith who has authored over 50 publications.
Ecomyths
Wednesday, May 07, 2008
Iconoclast, or not? 
EXCERPT:&#160; 
This is a comment I wrote for the weekly paper at my home university at the request of its editor.&#160; It seems appropriate for eco-myths as well.
I do not believe in anthropogenic global warming (AGW).&#160; There, said it. Out in the open.&#160; There are lots of reasons really but they are irrelevant to this essay.&#160; Because this essay i]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">953@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T22:38:52-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Al Gore’s Dog, Pony and Global Warming $how.</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=952</link>
<description><![CDATA[Would you give $$$ to this man just to sit down to&#160;hear a&#160;load of&#160;Gorebull baloney?
Why would anyone be that stupid to give the man $$$.Who has already amassed at least $100,000,000 from it?
Parkway Rest Stop
May 7, 2008
Al Gore&#8217;s Dog, Pony and Global Warming $how.
Filed under: Uncategorized &#8212; Jim @ 8:52 pm 

EXCERPT:

Suppose your organization (e.g. school, library, kntting circle, rugby team, local saloon) would like to book Al Gore to come to your organizat]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">952@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>enviroagenda</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T22:18:14-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>ENSO and Monthly Global Temperatures </title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=951</link>
<description><![CDATA[ICECAP

May 08, 2008
ENSO and Monthly Global Temperatures 
By Joseph D&#8217;Aleo, CCM 
EXCERPT:
In a recent story we showed how the PDO cycle related to the relative frequency of El Ninos and La Ninas and through that, global temperatures. This is the case because El Ninos lead to global warmth and La Ninas a cooling. 

MORE HERE
]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">951@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>mythsandfacts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T15:38:18-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Average temperature vs average irradiance </title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=950</link>
<description><![CDATA[The Reference Frame
Sunday, May 04, 2008 
Average temperature vs average irradiance 
EXCERPT:


Vincent Gray and Alan Siddons have been emphasizing an important point that the (arithmetic) average temperature is not the relevant quantity that should be substituted into various calculations of the heat and energy budget of Earth.

Why? Because what matters for the energy budget is the average radiated (or absorbed) energy. According to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, the energy radiated by a bl]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">950@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>mythsandfacts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-07T22:48:52-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Global Warming and Cooling - The Reality </title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=949</link>
<description><![CDATA[CO2 Sceptics
Global Warming and Cooling - The Reality 
Wednesday May 07, 2008 2:39 PM BST
EXCERPT:
Stephen Wilde has been a Fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society since 1968. The first two article's from Mr Wilde were received with a great deal of interest throughout the Co2 Sceptic community. 

In Stephen Wilde's third and exclusive article for CO2Sceptics.Com, he explores the mechanics and mechanism involved that are attributed to the Earth's Warming and Cooling, needless to say the ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">949@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-07T22:41:59-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Environmentalists Still Can't Get It Right</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=948</link>
<description><![CDATA[Investors Business Daily
Environmentalists Still Can't Get It Right

By WALTER E. WILLIAMS | Posted Tuesday, May 06, 2008 4:30 PM PT 
EXCERPT:
Now that another Earth Day has come and gone, let's look at some environmentalist predictions they would prefer we forget.
At the first Earth Day celebration, in 1969, environmentalist Nigel Calder warned, &#34;The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind.&#34; 
C.C.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">948@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-07T22:37:12-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Slower Sea Level Rise</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=947</link>
<description><![CDATA[World Climate Report
May 6, 2008
Slower Sea Level Rise
One of the major pillars of the greenhouse scare is that sea level is rising due to global warming, coastlines will be inundated, and disasters will occur in coastal areas throughout the world. Who could ever forget Al Gore&#8217;s documentary showing us the World Trade Center Memorial under water due to sea level rise? A year ago, climate change hero James Hansen warned the world that non-linearities in the ocean-atmosphere system could ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">947@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>mythsandfacts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-07T22:34:19-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>The 10 deadliest storms in history</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=946</link>
<description><![CDATA[The list is in the link.Worth reading to see that Al Gore is as usual wrong.
The worst storm on record happened during the worldwide cooling trend.
msnbc
The 10 deadliest storms in history
Killer cyclones have an impact that lasts long after the winds die down
 
Getty Images file
Children on the island of Bhola wade through floodwater after a tropical cyclone and tidal wave hit the area on Nov. 13, 1970. The storm killed as many as 500,000 people and contributed to the secession of Bangla]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">946@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>IntheNews</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-07T22:29:46-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Al Gore Calls Myanmar Cyclone a 'Consequence' of Global Warming </title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=945</link>
<description><![CDATA[What a sensitive fellow.
Business and Media Institute
Al Gore Calls Myanmar Cyclone a 'Consequence' of Global Warming
Former vice president tells NPR's 'Fresh Air' cyclone is example of 'consequences that scientists have long predicted might be associated with continued global warming.' 
By Jeff Poor 
Business &#38; Media Institute
5/6/2008 4:04:54 PM 

EXCERPT:






&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; Using tragedy to advance an agenda has been a strategy for many global warming activists,]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">945@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>enviroagenda</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-07T22:23:19-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>RSS MSU LT Global Temperature Anomaly for April 2008 - flat</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=944</link>
<description><![CDATA[Many thoughtful comments in the link worth reading.
Watts up with that?
5-5-2008
RSS MSU LT Global Temperature Anomaly for April 2008 -&#160;flat
EXCERPT:
I&#8217;ve plotted the results of the RSS Microwave Sounder Unit (MSU) global temperature anomaly data by RSS (Remote Sensing Systems of Santa Rosa, CA).
For April 2008 it has moved a tiny bit higher, with a value of .080&#176;C for a change (&#8710;T) of 0.001&#176;C globally from March.
MORE HERE]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">944@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-07T22:17:08-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Open Letter To Environmentalists - John Coleman </title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=943</link>
<description><![CDATA[http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/12661711.html
Exert
&#34;With all that powerful support for your anti-fossil fuel movement, and&#160;with the worthy goal of saving the planet from the disastrous consequences of runaway Global Warming, how can you fail? 
Here's how: The science behind your global warming scare is bad and no anthropogenic global warming is happening. Dissenting scientists have now produced convincing evidence that the cornerstone of your scientific argument, increas]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">943@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>IntheNews</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-05T20:13:51-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by Derek</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation - By Joe D'Aleo</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=942</link>
<description><![CDATA[And so&#160;next week has arrived - 
http://intellicast.com/Community/Content.aspx?a=127
Everything you ever wanted to know about AMO's...
Exert
&#34; Last week, we discussed the Pacific decadal Oscillation (PDO) and its impact on the frequency of El Ninos and La Ninas, which have an effect on the position of global troughs and ridges and through them global patterns of temperatures and precipitation. 
The Atlantic also has a multidecadal oscillation called the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscill]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">942@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>mythsandfacts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-05T20:13:32-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by Derek</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Are Global Warmists Pulling a Cool Fast One?</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=941</link>
<description><![CDATA[By Marc Sheppard
Excerpt:

Mounting evidence of lower temperature trends despite rising atmospheric CO2 levels is becoming a real problem for the greenhouse gas crowd.&#160; And reports that the cooling appears to follow a period of dormant solar activity aren't likely to ease their anxieties. 



Indeed, without an immediate alarmist course correction, years of &#34;the science is settled&#34; campaigning could prove for naught, as prolonged temperature dips decimate the primary anthro]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">941@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>IntheNews</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-05T14:44:04-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by Steve_LeMaster</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Economic suicide: </title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=940</link>
<description><![CDATA[Steven F. Hayward has sifted through Census Bureau population projections and compared per-capita Energy, CO2 and etc. quantities for 2050 under the demo-eviros emission reduction plan (80 percent by 2050).&#160; The energy use per household would average 2500 Kwh/year compared to 10,500 today.&#160; This is just enough juice to run a hot water heater, and nothing else.&#160; He had a summary article in the Wall Street Journal last week (4/28/08).

Another gem:&#160; the CO2 limit combined wit]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">940@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>enviroagenda</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-04T20:40:25-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by RonKilmartin</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>New Jason Satellite Indicates 23-Year Global Cooling</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=939</link>
<description><![CDATA[I am supposed to be on &#34;vacation&#34; from this website.But this is too good to pass up.
Canada Free Press
New Jason Satellite Indicates 23-Year Global Cooling
&#160;By Dennis Avery&#160;&#160;Thursday, May 1, 2008 

EXCERPT:
Now it&#8217;s not just the sunspots that predict a 23-year global cooling. The new Jason oceanographic satellite shows that 2007 was a &#8220;cool&#8221; La Nina year&#8212;but Jason also says something more important is at work: The much larger and more persis]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">939@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-03T19:48:33-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>More Carbon Dioxide, Please - Roy Spencer.</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=938</link>
<description><![CDATA[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MWJlODMxYmUzYWNmZGZiM2NhNmExYTYyNDUzYmViZjQ=&#38;w=MA==
National Review Online.

More Carbon Dioxide, Please
Raising a scientific question.&#160;&#160;- May 1, 2008 9:00 AM
Exerts.
&#34; There seems to be an unwritten assumption among environmentalists &#8212; and among the media &#8212; that any influence humans have on nature is, by definition, bad. I even see it in scientific papers written by climate researchers...
But if nature was left undisturb]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">938@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>IntheNews</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-02T14:27:00-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by Derek</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Relationship of the PDO to El Nino and La Nina Frequency</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=937</link>
<description><![CDATA[Many easy to read charts in the link
Intellicast.com
The Relationship of the PDO to El Nino and La Nina Frequency


By Joe D'Aleo
Monday, April 28, 2008

EL NINO DOMINANCE SINCE THE LATE 1970S EXPLAINED
&#160;
John McLean in a paper here&#160;reported Australia's CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology (Power and Smith 2007) wrote about a period of unprecedented El Ni&#241;o dominance the last 30 years, which they blamed on human activity. Vecchi (2006, 2007) speculated there was a just 1% p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">937@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-02T09:45:40-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is the earth getting warmer, or cooler?</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=936</link>
<description><![CDATA[Want to guess who runs the NASA climate office?
Hint: a politically compromised and environmentalist activist director.
This and many more examples of the deliberate rewriting of temperature data.The reason why I do not accept&#160; their data.
The Register
Is the earth getting warmer, or cooler?
A tale of two thermometers
By Steven Goddard &#8594; More by this author
Published Friday 2nd May 2008 10:02&#160;GMT

EXCERPT:


Analysis A paper published in scientific journal Nature this ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">936@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>mythsandfacts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-02T09:35:04-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>More Carbon Dioxide, Please</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=935</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dr. Roy W. Spencer is a Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville.
National Review Online


    
        
            
            E-mail Author
            Author Archive
            Send to a Friend
            Print Version
            
            
            
        
    

May 1, 2008 9:00 AM
More Carbon Dioxide, Please
By Roy Spencer
EXCERPT:


    
        
            
            There seems to be an unwritten assumption among en]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">935@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-01T21:52:41-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Junk Science: The Great Global Warming Race </title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=934</link>
<description><![CDATA[LOL
FoxNews
Junk Science: The Great Global Warming Race 
Thursday, May 01, 2008
By Steven Milloy
EXCERPT:
Can global warming&#8217;s vested interests close the deal on greenhouse gas regulation before the public wises up to their scam?
A new study indicates alarmist concern and a need to explain away the lack of actual global warming. Researchers belonging to the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, reported in Nature (May 1) that after adjusting their climate model to]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">934@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>IntheNews</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-01T21:43:03-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>La Nina and Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO)</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=933</link>
<description><![CDATA[Check out the prediction here!

La Nina and Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO)
Cooling in the Pacific Ocean

Don J. Easterbrook, Dept. of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA

The announcement by NASA&#8217;s Jet Propulsion Laboratory that the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) had
shifted to its cool phase (Fig. 1) is right on schedule as predicted by past climate and PDO changes
(Easterbrook, 2001, 2006, 2007). It is not an oddity superimposed upon and masking the pred]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">933@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>IntheNews</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-04-30T20:46:08-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by Itscoldinhere</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>CFL Problems Coming to Light: Good News for LED’s</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=932</link>
<description><![CDATA[Definitely worth the read.
Excerpt:
One of my investment themes is that LED&#8217;s will be the dominant lighting technology of the future.&#160; Since LED&#8217;s are based on silicon chips and since chip-based products have such a strong history of rapid quality improvement and cost reduction, I think LED&#8217;s will become better and better and will cost less and less over time.&#160; Their energy efficiency is already the best and their longevity is also a proven quality.&#160;
One&#160;]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">932@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>mythsandfacts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-04-30T17:26:45-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by Steve_LeMaster</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Precautionary Principle: Possibly the biggest sham of our time.</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=931</link>
<description><![CDATA[Depleted Cranium
Precautionary Principle: Possibly the biggest sham of our time.
April 26th, 2008 
EXCERPT:

About Precautionary Principle: 
Precautionary principle sounds logical: When you aren&#8217;t sure if something might cause harm, be careful and don&#8217;t do anything that could be dangerous, especially to anything really important like human lives, the environment and so on. It also seems like it would not be a new or revolutionary concept. However, Precautionary Principle is rea]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">931@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-04-30T09:36:23-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>NASA: PDO flip to cool phase confirmed - cooler times ahead for the West Coast?</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=930</link>
<description><![CDATA[Tropics cooling,
Southern Hemisphere cooling,
Oceans cooling,
Quiet Sun.Extended cycle 23 meaning next cycle be a cooler one.
AO cooling.And now a cooling PDO trend.
All that is left is the AMO phase that is still a warming one.Slated to end within ten years.
The significant worldwide cooling trend in the future is more and more a serious possibility.
What do the AGW believers have to counter it with?
Watts Up With That?
4-29-2008
NASA: PDO flip to cool phase confirmed - cooler times a]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">930@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>randomthoughts</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-04-29T23:47:23-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>Judge orders action on polar bear protection</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=929</link>
<description><![CDATA[Where is the evidence that Polar bears are endangered?
Excerpt:
Environmental groups scored a win Monday night when a federal judge ordered the Bush administration to cease its foot dragging over a decision whether to give polar bears Endangered Species Act protections. 
&#160;
Scientists with the U.S. Geological Survey predicted in September 2007 that most of the bears would be gone in a few decades: 

&#34;(F)uture reduction of sea ice in the Arctic could result in a loss of two-thirds ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">929@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>enviroagenda</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-04-29T17:57:55-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by Steve_LeMaster</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Real Cost of Tackling Climate Change</title>
<link>http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=928</link>
<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal
The Real Cost of Tackling Climate Change
By STEVEN F. HAYWARD
April 28, 2008;&#160;Page&#160;A19
EXCERPT:

The usual chorus of environmentalists and editorial writers has chimed in to attack President Bush's recent speech on climate change. In his address of April 23, he put forth a goal of stopping the growth of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by the year 2025.
&#34;Way too little and way too late,&#34; runs the refrain, followed by the claim that nothing less tha]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">928@http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info</guid>
<dc:subject>IntheNews</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-04-29T09:32:36-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by sunsettommy</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
