Sunsettommy
FORUM OWNER
      
Posts: 2,101
Joined: Jul 2009
|
A devastating response to “There’s nothing to see here, move along”
Watts Up With That?
12-04-2009
Guest post by John A
EXCERPT:
The usual armwaving denial that we should not trust our own lying eyes was delivered by a Harvard Professor in the Boston Globe:
James McCarthy, a respected Harvard professor who was a former Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change lead author, sent a letter to Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) today stressing that e-mails stolen from climate scientists do not undermine the evidenc[e] for manmade global warming.
McCarthy is board chair of both the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).
The letter reads “The scientific process depends on open access to methodology, data, and a rigorous peer-review process. The robust exchange of ideas in the peer-reviewed literature regarding climate science is evidence of the high degree of integrity in this process. The body of evidence that human activity is prominent agent in global warming is overwhelming. The content of these a few personal emails has no impact what-so-ever on our overall understanding that human activity is driving dangerous levels of global warming.”
In the words of Frank Drebin: “Nothing to see here, move along!”
LINK
===================================================
Quote:The content of these a few personal emails has no impact what-so-ever on our overall understanding that human activity is driving dangerous levels of global warming.”
What a lying jerk James McCarthy is.
What Global Warming?
|
|
| 12-04-2009 07:52 PM |
|
Derek
Administrator
      
Posts: 1,066
Joined: Jul 2009
|
RE: A devastating response to “There’s nothing to see here, move along”
Did he not write
When it is time to join a bandwagon,
for personnal profit above morals..
I am a denier of CAGW.
I have been told that I must be a NASCAR enthusiast, a right to lifer,
a racist, a redneck, trailer trash, a flat-earther, an intelligent design advocate, and
a wealth of other things based on no more information than that
I evaluated catastrophic AGW as wrong.
28th June 2010 - Charles R. Anderson PhD.
|
|
| 12-08-2009 02:19 PM |
|