What is a Watt???

[Derek]

Thank you Richard111.

Richard111 wrote,
" I also agree ALL global energy budgets calculated with reference to global surface temperatures are complete bull-shit. Satellites show the global radiation ballance of -18C FROM THE ATMOSPHERE is correct to ballance incoming radiation from the sun. "

I also find it surprising how few people have grasped the notion that the atmosphere has an effective surface of emission,
as described by Joe Postma, in his recent papers.
AND,
That so few have realised such a measurement does not actually mean, nor prove that,
IN EQUALS OUT or else, BOOOOM.
For such to be even possibly true, there would have to be no life on this planet at all.

Snow, sleet, rain, heck even mist, and morning dew is cold. Then there is also grass frost.
"Where" are those at present in "consensus" "climate science" global energy budgets????
etc, etc, etc..

We live in a strange era of "natural sciences".
I think "we" are in a "Copernicus stage" in regards of "consensus climate science" and the failed Greenhouse Effect hypothesis at present.
But, in the end, the truth will out, in spite of the political will.
That, the political will, is, in my opinion, THE source of the problems in the natural sciences.