What is a Watt???

[Derek]

At,
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/10/26/do...a-paradox/

I posted,

Derek says:
October 27, 2011 at 11:22 am

A black body emits W/m2 AT A POWER according to it’s temperature.
A gray body emits AT A LOWER POWER than a black body (at the same temperature) for many well known reasons.
THAT, is NOT an energy flow, for a gray body IT IS the power the energy flow is emitted at…….
The volume of the energy flow IS NOT DESCRIBED.
So, as the gray bodies depicted in the K&T budgets are all different sizes and temperatures,
the diagram CAN NOT be correct (for power or volume),
UNLESS THEY ARE ALL (EQUAL) BLACK BODIES….
This also applies to all present explanations of GH “theory”.
Did you realise K&T and GH is ALL explained in “black body”???

It has taken me ages to realise the above, and it’s importance. It’s all imaginary.
http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/fo...l#pid10470
(Particularly post 21 onwards.)
I doubt I am alone in that.

K&T depicts a black body world, in all it’s parts, AND, with no life, as does GH “theory”.
Makes me wonder how they “measure” the figures supposedly from (gray body) “reality”….
It’s a scam, plain and simple. A politically convenient, imaginary hobgoblin.

The world ain’t flat, and CO2 does not drive, nor even measurably influence, climate.
Wake up people.
There can not possibly be a “greenhouse effect” as presently hypothesized,
IN ANY OF IT’S PRESENTLY TOUTED “FORMS”.