|
Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
|
|
01-03-2011, 10:23 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
Given all the news on severe snow and ice for the NH this winter I have been keeping an eye on the Arctic ice extent at AMSR-E Sea Ice Concentration
Richard North at EU Referendum alerted me to this report: Ten ships, 600 crew trapped in frozen Sea of Okhotsk AMSR-E shows almost no ice for the Sea of Okhotsk! Who can we believe any more? CO2 comes from coal, coal comes from fossilised trees, fossilised trees come from living trees, living trees growth comes from CO2 therefore coal is carbon neutral. ...from here |
|||
|
01-04-2011, 04:24 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
The Russians have been over the last few years building up the number of ice breaking ships they have.
It would seem they know who to believe. In the UK councils have been selling off their gritting vehicles, because, the climate models are telling them they will not be needing them in the present or near future. Apparently though, no body remembered to tell Mother Nature... Governments and politicians planning ONLY for warming IS the climate crime we will all pay the price of. The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. H. L. Mencken. The hobgoblins have to be imaginary so that "they" can offer their solutions, not THE solutions. |
|||
|
01-05-2011, 12:50 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
Last night, 4th January 2011, CCTV News (China) reported those Russian ships to be trapped in ice up to 2 metres thick! This has to be "new ice". Must be an alarmist report.
![]() I wonder what the Chinese agenda is? CO2 comes from coal, coal comes from fossilised trees, fossilised trees come from living trees, living trees growth comes from CO2 therefore coal is carbon neutral. ...from here |
|||
|
01-05-2011, 02:45 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. H. L. Mencken. The hobgoblins have to be imaginary so that "they" can offer their solutions, not THE solutions. |
|||
|
01-06-2011, 12:54 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
The Okhotsk crisis deepens
Posted by Richard North, EUReferendum, 6 January 2011 Links and pictures. Not looking good for the Russians. CO2 comes from coal, coal comes from fossilised trees, fossilised trees come from living trees, living trees growth comes from CO2 therefore coal is carbon neutral. ...from here |
|||
|
01-12-2011, 10:52 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
Icebreaking rescue mission
Published: 11 January, 2011, 22:17 Quote:13 days into the maritime drama that’s been playing out in the Okhotsk Sea and those ice-breakers are still working hard to battle the tough conditions that have made this rescue operation so hard going. My emphasis. CO2 comes from coal, coal comes from fossilised trees, fossilised trees come from living trees, living trees growth comes from CO2 therefore coal is carbon neutral. ...from here |
|||
|
01-16-2011, 12:22 PM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
The battle continues...
Russian icebreakers continue rescue efforts in Okhotsk Sea Quote:According to the rescue plan, the icebreakers will continue towing the Sodruzhestvo, while the Bereg Nadezhdy will attempt to sail on its own along the channel cut in the ice by Admiral Makarov and Krasin. CO2 comes from coal, coal comes from fossilised trees, fossilised trees come from living trees, living trees growth comes from CO2 therefore coal is carbon neutral. ...from here |
|||
|
01-17-2011, 05:26 AM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
Hmm... seems like someone else is confident about Arctic ice. Got the link from Joe Bastardi's Europe Column
Trends in Arctic ice thickness and volume Posted by Frank Lansner (frank) on 11th January, 2011 Quote:A significant thick ice recovery is taking place now. CO2 comes from coal, coal comes from fossilised trees, fossilised trees come from living trees, living trees growth comes from CO2 therefore coal is carbon neutral. ...from here |
|||
|
01-19-2011, 01:36 PM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
The Russian ships are still in trouble [18/1/2011]:
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2011/01...-over.html "Correlation is NOT Causation"
|
|||
|
01-20-2011, 04:27 PM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
From the latest link (post #9) is this gem of another "journalist" making a total fool of himself:
Quote:Oblivious to all this then comes Roger Howard in The Daily Telegraph telling us that "regional sea ice is retreating fast, threatening to raise global sea levels, destroy traditional habitats and ways of life, and accelerate the rate at which the planet as a whole is warming up".
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies. –William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952 |
|||
|
01-20-2011, 05:09 PM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
The MSM just can't see their way to reporting facts.
Update on the ships ... 3 weeks and counting: http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2011/01...-hold.html "Correlation is NOT Causation"
|
|||
|
02-02-2013, 08:53 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-02-2013 08:56 AM by Richard111.)
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Arctic Ice: reports accurate?
Been scratching my head as to why sea ice extent has not been updated since January 15 when they claim Daily Updated Time series of Arctic sea ice area and extent derived from SSMI data provided by NERSC.
So I went over to The Cryosphere Today web page and looked at this chart: ![]() and noticed an oddity - hey, Willis said that! No. What I notice is the LOW ICE each year. When the ice recovers in winter the RANGE OF RECOVERY is actuall greater than the max/min mean of the reference years. Seems to be around 20 million square kilometres of EXTRA ICE even if the max does not exceed the mean of the good years. Must mean something.
CO2 comes from coal, coal comes from fossilised trees, fossilised trees come from living trees, living trees growth comes from CO2 therefore coal is carbon neutral. ...from here |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)









![[Image: seaice_recent_arctic.png]](http://i787.photobucket.com/albums/yy154/RichardDH/AGW/seaice_recent_arctic.png)
No. What I notice is the LOW ICE each year. When the ice recovers in winter the RANGE OF RECOVERY is actuall greater than the max/min mean of the reference years. Seems to be around 20 million square kilometres of EXTRA ICE even if the max does not exceed the mean of the good years. Must mean something.