Nellie the neutron. New Clear Science. Oliver K Manuel.

[Derek]

Hi All,

Former United States President Dwight D. Eisenhower - Why we have received misleading information from Government scientists.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOLld5PR4ts

Oliver K Manuel - Nellie the neutron.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saf90qlChHY

Oliver K Manuel - New Clear Science.
Part 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itNMwMkm6rE

Part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CrEoyOMDUM

Part 3 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2H4eAqLO6AM

The above have been added to my playlists on You Tube as a single playlist titled,
OKM New Clear Science

[Derek]

Hi All,
Elsewhere I noticed some very interesting and related to this threads topic comments by Hans Jelbring.
I have asked and now have got permission from Hans to post the below.


Einstein was not the first to write down the formula E = mc^2.

There is no observational evidence that ALL of a (stable) mass m can turn into energy or alternatively ALL of an energy quantity can turn into (stable) matter.
When electron and positrons are created simultaneously the situation last less than a fraction of second.

There is another hypothesis that satisfies the observed relation between matter and energy and that is (E=energy, m = mass and K is constant, c is speed of light)

K = E + m c^2 (1)

We observe that K has the dimension of energy. Differentiate the equation and we get.

dE = - d(m c^2) (2)

Assuming c is constant

dE = - dm c^2 (3)

This solution would mean that energy and mass are each others negations and were created simultaneously when ALL mass is involved.
In such a case energy and mass is created from an energy source of unknown identity.
Hypothetically it would then also be possible to withdraw energy and mass simultaneously from our world into the unknown energy source.

Equation (3) supports observational evidence from atom and hydrogen bombs where only a fraction of mass do turn into energy, never ALL the mass.
The differentiation and missing minus sign turn out to be the critical part when interpreting the formula E = m c^2.
This formula should actually be written dE = +/- dm c^2 which would denote exothermic and endothermic nuclear reactions.
Endothermic nuclear reactions are probably a little known and little investigated reality in our known physical universe.

Hans Jelbring PhD.

I also asked Hans if it was possible for a further clarification of his (to many I would assume) rather startling statement that,
"Einstein was not the first to write down the formula E = mc^2."

Hans has kindly since sent me the following.

" Olinto De Pretto (1857–1921) was an Italian industrialist, physicist and geologist from Schio, Vicenza.

He is credited with being the first person to derive the precise formula E=mc2

and is also the first to conclude that radioactive decay of uranium and thorium was an example of energy transformation from mass into energy. "

he also further quoted the same source, which I assume is this Wikipedia page, that,

" Olinto De Pretto was born on April 26, 1857 in Schio in the province of Vicenza in northern Italy.
Olinto was the sixth of seven children (three boys, four girls). His mother was Angelica Boschetti (1822-1905).
His father, Pietro De Pretto (1810-1891), was an architect whose hobbies included astronomy and geology, two studies Olinto would later take up.

He attended the Superior School of Agriculture in Milano where he studied agriculture and geology with a major in Agronomics.
He graduated in 1879 with a degree in Agronomics. Immediately upon graduation he became a university assistant to Professor Gaetano Cantoni, a Dean of the agricultural school.
Together they developed methods that helped modernize Italian agriculture by improving methods of crop rotation and analyzing soil chemistry.[1]

When Cantoni died in 1887, Olinto left the university and became a director at a mechanical foundry mill owned by his older brother Silvio,
where he worked for the rest of his life.[2] "

[Derek]

Hi All,
Elsewhere discussions have been going on that are closely related to this posts subject area.
I have seen the attached pdf linked to, I think it is an excellent introduction to the wider subject area.

http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Charvatova_SIM.pdf
A possible role
of the solar inertial motion
in climatic changes
Ivanka Charvátová and Pavel Hejda
Oslo, August 08 - Role of SIM in climatic changes

The wider subject area would also include,
http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/calen12/petterson_1.html
Climatic variations in historic and prehistoric time.
By Professor Otto PETTERSON
Published in 1913 in
UR Svenska Hydrografisk-Biologiska Kommisionens Skrifter

[Derek]

http://judithcurry.com/2011/05/14/on-adm...ment-69120

Major Mistakes Not Acknowledged

1. Solar wind data from Apollo lunar soils showed Earth's heat source is NOT a ball of hydrogen [1].

Data from the 1995 Galileo Probe of Jupiter confirmed: The Sun is a plasma diffuser that sorts atoms by mass and covers the photosphere with lightweight elements [2]: 91% H, 9% He.

Now four decades after Apollo, the current science news story: "Scientists surprised by solar wind data from the Genesis mission."

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-05-scie...ssion.html

2. Nuclear rest mass data revealed neutron repulsion as the most powerful source of nuclear energy - an energy source that causes violent eruptions and releases hydrogen (H) as a waste product [3].

Advocates of AGW ignored nuclear rest mass data and the information they contain about Earth's violently unstable source of heat.

Today's surprising science news stories:

"Crab Nebula's gamma-ray flare mystifies astronomers"

"Fermi telescope spots 'superflares' in the Crab Nebula"

"Crab nebula: The crab in action & the case of the dog that did not bark"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13362958

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-05-ferm...ebula.html

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-05-crab...e-dog.html

Earth’s climate is controlled by a neutron star in the core of the Sun [3]. It also behaves like “the dog that did not bark".

William Herschel noted the link between sunspots and agricultural production in the 1800s. Carrington confirmed the Sun’s impulsive behavior in September 1859 - when Earth was totally engulfed by a solar eruption [4].

These mistakes expose that world leaders and their army of government-funded climatologists are totally powerless compared to the forces that control Earth’s climate.

References:

1. "Solar abundances of the elements", Meteoritics 18, 209-222 (1983).

2. "Isotopic ratios in Jupiter confirm intra-solar diffusion", Meteoritics 33, A97, 5011 (1998).

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc98/pdf/5011.pdf

3. "Neutron repulsion confirmed as energy source", Journal of Fusion Energy 20, 197-201 (2001); "Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate", Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)

4. Stuart Clark, “ The Sun Kings: The Unexpected Tragedy of Richard Carrington and the Tale of How Modern Astronomy Began” [Princeton University Press, 2007] 211 pages