Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 124 Votes - 2.9 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Articles?
06-04-2010, 04:01 PM
Post: #41
RE: Articles?
There is new research released and linked at "The Resilient Earth"
http://theresilientearth.com/?q=content/...-emissions
Excerpt:
Scientists are coming to the realization that claims about greenhouse gas emissions can have integrity only if verified by direct atmospheric measurements. Emissions data are produced by greenhouse gas emitters of all sizes—farms, factories and entire nations. These emissions are often quoted with high precision but, as Euan Nisbet and Ray Weiss state in their article, “misreporting still occurs, whether by simple error, ignorance, or intention.” They claim that carbon-equivalent emissions are currently assessed by “bottom-up” methods, which are made up from a variety of local statistics such as fuel consumption or numbers of cows. When these measured “bottom-up” emissions are rolled up to a global scale, the amounts can disagree by factors of two or more when compared with direct atmospheric measurements.

How can you control GHG emissions when you cannot accurately identify their sources? And how can you blame the rise in atmospheric CO2 solely on humanity if you cannot reconcile actual emissions with atmospheric measurements? The answer is that you cannot. To try and shore up the case for emissions control—including all those calls for “cap and trade” and a carbon tax—the authors want to establish a global network to provide a “top down” assessment of anthropogenic emission.
Find all posts by this user Give Reputation to this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-26-2010, 07:43 PM
Post: #42
RE: Articles?
The CO2 Record in Plant Fossils

It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Give Reputation to this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-06-2011, 07:31 PM
Post: #43
RE: Articles?
Water Absorption Spectrum

http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/vibrat.html

It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Give Reputation to this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-26-2011, 08:07 AM
Post: #44
RE: Articles?
Origins of Extreme Weather

Selected Excerpt:

Water and Heat

[Image: latentheat.gif]

Water has one of the highest heat capacities of all known substances. This means that it takes a lot of heat to raise the temperature of water by just one degree. Water thus absorbs a tremendous amount of heat from solar radiation, and furthermore, because solar radiation can penetrate water easily, large amounts of solar energy are stored in the world's oceans.
Further energy is absorbed by water vapor as the latent heat of vaporization, which is the heat required to evaporate water or change it from a liquid to a vapor. This latent heat of vaporization is given up to the atmosphere when water condenses to form liquid water as rain. If the rain changes to a solid in the form of snow or ice, it also releases a quantity of heat known as the latent heat of fusion.
Thus, both liquid water and water vapor are important in absorbing heat from solar radiation and transporting and redistributing this heat around the planet.

It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Give Reputation to this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-26-2011, 07:16 PM (This post was last modified: 06-26-2011 07:18 PM by ajmplanner.)
Post: #45
RE: Articles?
"How can you control GHG emissions when you cannot accurately identify their sources? And how can you blame the rise in atmospheric CO2 solely on humanity if you cannot reconcile actual emissions with atmospheric measurements? The answer is that you cannot. To try and shore up the case for emissions control—including all those calls for “cap and trade” and a carbon tax—the authors want to establish a global network to provide a “top down” assessment of anthropogenic emission."

To add to your argument, I recently read that the total amount of estimated human produced CO2 in the atmosphere falls within the estimated error of the sum of all of the other natural sources of CO2.

The very foundations of AGW are slowly crumbling under the assault of scientists who were always suspicious of AGW assumptions but were previously afraid to speak out. Thankfully, it is becoming more fashionable to challenge the IPCC and its modelers. Unfortunately, politicians and media are still listening to the nonsense spewing from Gore and Hansen.
Find all posts by this user Give Reputation to this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-26-2011, 10:35 PM
Post: #46
RE: Articles?
(06-26-2011 07:16 PM)ajmplanner Wrote:  And how can you blame the rise in atmospheric CO2 solely on humanity if you cannot reconcile actual emissions with atmospheric measurements?

Oooo I can answer that one. It's all about the carbon ratios. What the ratios show, according to my sources which I will link, it shows that ALL of the natural CO2 and HALF of the man made CO2 are being sunk. Ok that is probably not the scientific way of saying it but you get my meaning. Anyway, half of the anthro CO2 remains in the atmosphere so we are solely responsible for the increase as we are knocking the totals above what the sinks can naturally deal with.

http://www.ferdinand-engelbeen.be/klimaa...ments.html

“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”.J Robert Oppenheimer.
Find all posts by this user Give Reputation to this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-06-2012, 08:31 PM
Post: #47
RE: Articles?
A Chronological Listing of Early
Weather Events


http://www.breadandbutterscience.com/Weather.pdf

It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Give Reputation to this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2012, 07:23 PM
Post: #48
RE: Articles?
Your one stop shopping page for US Government climate data tampering

http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/data-...ushcngiss/

It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Give Reputation to this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2012, 08:13 PM
Post: #49
RE: Articles?
That's a good one. Added to favorites for future torment of others. Angel

Potato chip enthusiast.
Find all posts by this user Give Reputation to this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2012, 08:14 PM
Post: #50
RE: Articles?
Skeptical Views in non-English countries

http://ecotretas.blogspot.no/p/skeptical...glish.html

It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Give Reputation to this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-13-2014, 06:12 AM
Post: #51
RE: Articles?
Jo Nova

The 800 year lag – graphed

http://joannenova.com.au/global-warming-...ore-graph/

It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Give Reputation to this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)