Incredibly stupid debate

[Sunsettommy]

Here is the link to a debate between skeptics and alarmists.

Report: 1000+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm

Poptech tried hard to penetrate a couple of warmist rockheads over Dr. Pilke's complaints about the way they see their science papers being included in the list.

The same particular rockhead who keeps posting other threads to carry on the already addressed the original complaint made by Dr. Pielke that Andrew (Poptech) made at his blog HERE:

Quote:Preface: The following papers support skeptic arguments against Anthropogenic Climate Change (ACC), Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) or ACC/AGW Alarm.

ACC/AGW Alarm: (defined), "concern relating to a perceived negative environmental or socio-economic effect of ACC/AGW, usually exaggerated as catastrophic."

Disclaimer: The inclusion of a paper in this list does not imply a specific personal position to any of the authors. While a minority of authors on the list cannot be labeled skeptics (e.g. Harold Brooks, Roger Pielke Jr., Roger Pielke Sr.) their paper(s) or results from their paper(s) can still support skeptic's arguments against ACC/AGW alarm. Various papers are mutually exclusive and should be considered independently. This list will be updated and corrected as necessary.

The list is a resource for skeptics not a list of skeptics.

There are currently 74 comments there.Seven of them are mine.

Some warmists are simply too stupid too figure it out and make total fools of themselves in the process.