Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Richard S Courtney's comment
#1
From HERE

Quote:richardscourtney says:
May 4, 2013 at 1:00 am

John Parsons aka atarsinc:

At May 4, 2013 at 12:05 am you say

Well, if a “pause” is all you’ve got…it’s all you’ve got.

For the first time on WUWT, you make a good point.

The “pause” is all the warmunists have got. And they said it was impossible.

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said the “pause” could not happen because of “committed warming” which is an inherent part of the AGW-hypothesis as emulated by climate models.

The explanation for this is in IPCC AR4 (2007) Chapter 10.7 which can be read at
http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data...s10-7.html

It says there

The multi-model average warming for all radiative forcing agents held constant at year 2000 (reported earlier for several of the models by Meehl et al., 2005c), is about 0.6°C for the period 2090 to 2099 relative to the 1980 to 1999 reference period. This is roughly the magnitude of warming simulated in the 20th century. Applying the same uncertainty assessment as for the SRES scenarios in Fig. 10.29 (–40 to +60%), the likely uncertainty range is 0.3°C to 0.9°C. Hansen et al. (2005a) calculate the current energy imbalance of the Earth to be 0.85 W m–2, implying that the unrealised global warming is about 0.6°C without any further increase in radiative forcing. The committed warming trend values show a rate of warming averaged over the first two decades of the 21st century of about 0.1°C per decade, due mainly to the slow response of the oceans. About twice as much warming (0.2°C per decade) would be expected if emissions are within the range of the SRES scenarios.

In other words, it was expected that global temperature would rise at an average rate of “0.2°C per decade” over the first two decades of this century with half of this rise being due to atmospheric GHG emissions which were already in the system.

This assertion of “committed warming” should have had large uncertainty because the Report was published in 2007 and there was then no indication of any global temperature rise over the previous 7 years. There has still not been any rise and we are now way past the half-way mark of the “first two decades of the 21st century”.

So, if this “committed warming” is to occur such as to provide a rise of 0.2°C per decade by 2020 then global temperature would need to rise over the next 7 years by about 0.4°C. And this assumes the “average” rise over the two decades is the difference between the temperatures at 2000 and 2020. If the average rise of each of the two decades is assumed to be the “average” (i.e. linear trend) over those two decades then global temperature now needs to rise before 2020 by more than it rose over the entire twentieth century. It only rose ~0.8°C over the entire twentieth century.

Simply, the “committed warming” has disappeared (perhaps it has eloped with Trenberth’s ‘missing heat’?).

This disappearance of the “committed warming” is – of itself – sufficient to falsify the AGW hypothesis as emulated by climate models. If we reach 2020 without any detection of the “committed warming” then it will be 100% certain that all projections of global warming are complete bunkum.

Richard
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Richard Courtney's comment Sunsettommy 0 169 04-13-2017, 07:50 AM
Last Post: Sunsettommy
  Richard S, Courtney's comment Sunsettommy 0 2,154 08-12-2015, 07:04 AM
Last Post: Sunsettommy
  Richard S. Courtney's comment Sunsettommy 3 3,155 07-26-2015, 11:09 AM
Last Post: Richard111
  Richard C. Courtney's comment Sunsettommy 0 2,278 05-10-2015, 02:56 PM
Last Post: Sunsettommy
  Richard C Courtney's comment Sunsettommy 0 3,120 04-17-2013, 07:20 AM
Last Post: Sunsettommy
  Richard S. Courtney's comment Sunsettommy 0 2,716 12-15-2012, 11:16 AM
Last Post: Sunsettommy
  Richard S Courtney's comment Sunsettommy 0 3,148 12-08-2012, 01:54 PM
Last Post: Sunsettommy
  Richards S Courtney's comment Sunsettommy 0 4,211 11-24-2012, 09:38 PM
Last Post: Sunsettommy
  Richard Courtney's comment Sunsettommy 6 7,731 10-18-2012, 06:23 PM
Last Post: Sunsettommy
  Richard 111's comment Sunsettommy 0 2,387 09-12-2012, 05:24 AM
Last Post: Sunsettommy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)