|
So...assess Copenhagen
|
|
01-04-2010, 01:22 AM
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: So...assess Copenhagen
I am becoming more and more convinced that the real agenda is population growth. When you consider all the aid handed to third world countries over the past decades, how many of these countries improved their GDP? Handing over hard cash without strings to a despot is a no brainer.
I read a post somewhere that claimed population reduction was the cheapest method of combating AGW. No mention of how this policy would be administered. CO2 comes from coal, coal comes from fossilised trees, fossilised trees come from living trees, living trees growth comes from CO2 therefore coal is carbon neutral. ...from here |
|||
|
01-04-2010, 03:07 PM
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: So...assess Copenhagen
(01-04-2010 01:22 AM)Richard111 Wrote: I am becoming more and more convinced that the real agenda is population growth. When you consider all the aid handed to third world countries over the past decades, how many of these countries improved their GDP? Handing over hard cash without strings to a despot is a no brainer. easy, how the greenies will administer this is something called h1n1 |
|||
|
01-04-2010, 08:18 PM
Post: #23
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: So...assess Copenhagen
We must continue to present the arguments and research against AGW along with its pernicious unintended consequences and its economic impact, regardless of what happened in Copenhagen in 2009. There will be a Copenhagen16 where die-hard wealth redistributors will continue their push for our economic destruction one way or the other.
I will only declare a "win" for the skeptics when Cap and Trade dies an ugly death, the one-sided enviromental presentations are removed from our schools, Al Gore shuts up, and at least one American politician and one liberal media outlet admits the error of their thinking. I don't anticipate making that declaration for a long time. |
|||
|
01-04-2010, 09:40 PM
Post: #24
|
|||
|
|||
RE: So...assess Copenhagen
(01-04-2010 08:18 PM)ajmplanner Wrote: We must continue to present the arguments and research against AGW along with its pernicious unintended consequences and its economic impact, regardless of what happened in Copenhagen in 2009. There will be a Copenhagen16 where die-hard wealth redistributors will continue their push for our economic destruction one way or the other. I agree that the fight for the return to rational policy making should continue,and that scientists need to be freed from the pressure brought upon them by various special interest groups. It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies. –William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952 |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread: | Author | Replies: | Views: | Last Post | |
| Petition to Oppose Cap & Trade, Copenhagen Accord | Questioning_Climate | 2 | 1,335 |
05-16-2010 04:00 PM Last Post: strogoff |
|
| Copenhagen summit in disarray after 'Danish text' leak | HarpoSpoke | 5 | 2,435 |
12-09-2009 07:06 AM Last Post: Sunsettommy |
|
| Copenhagen conundrum | Derek | 4 | 2,157 |
11-27-2009 07:51 AM Last Post: Sunsettommy |
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)







