The Fallacy of the Greenhouse Effect

[Sunsettommy]

Planetary Vision

October 18,2010

EXCERPT:

An object can warm through the absorption of electromagnetic radiation (EMR). However, an object passively warmed can't warm the object providing the warmth. Were this to be so energy could be multiplied for no extra input merely by having objects mutually radiate EMR. But there is no such temperature multiplication because the amount mutually exchanged cancels. It does not add as is required by greenhouse theory.

The reason that an object can be heated by EMR on earth by the sun is because the sun is warmer than the earth. The idea of the greenhouse effect is that the cooler, upper layers of air are able to warm a warmer ground by backradiation. But this can not happen.

Greenhouse theory would even require that the backradiation from the earth to the sun warms the sun by a small (if practically imperceptible) amount. This is impossible too because a cooler object can not warm a warmer one unless work is done. But greenhouse gas, not having an energy source, can not provide this work nor can the earth provide work to the sun.

LINK

[Richard111]

Hmm... lot of interesting reading there. Will comment more later.

Mean while I am one very unhappy bunny. My gas bill has gone from £40 a month to £57 a month even though I am using LESS gas!!!

I'm on pension, reduced by Gordon Brown's policies back in the early 2000s and no chance for any such rise in income for me. Can't wait for the Tea Party rep to call.